scolby
12-03-2001, 12:00 AM
I am curious about how people feel about blade steel thickness for given blade designs. Also if Sal is about, how decisions are made on thickness of steel used for each model.
This topic came up because today I received a Commemorative Worker in the mail. I opened the box with my current office carry knife, which is a William Henry Lancet. I noticed that the blade on the Lancet and the blade on the Worker have nearly identical blade lengths and blade belly. Comparing the two from the top, I notice that the Worker blade is almost twice the thickness of the WH blade (apoprox. 1/8" for the Worker vs. just over 1/16" for the Lancet).
Using them side by side, it seems that for this blade size, the Lancet is just about the right thickness and that the Worker blade could very definitely thinner without losing too much in performance. One of the reasons that I carry the Lancet is that it is very light at 27 grams. The Worker feels about double that. Reducing the blade thickness would lighten the knife and make it more attractive as an office EDC.
So is the blade thickness decided by economy of using similar thickness for all the knives produced? Decided by prototype? Has Spyderco looked into blades that are only 2.0 mm thick? And, do you like the blades the thickness they are, or do they seem too thick.
By the way, I love the blade thickness on the Chinook because it is such a good match to the overall design.
"Chance favors the prepared mind" - Louis Pasteur
This topic came up because today I received a Commemorative Worker in the mail. I opened the box with my current office carry knife, which is a William Henry Lancet. I noticed that the blade on the Lancet and the blade on the Worker have nearly identical blade lengths and blade belly. Comparing the two from the top, I notice that the Worker blade is almost twice the thickness of the WH blade (apoprox. 1/8" for the Worker vs. just over 1/16" for the Lancet).
Using them side by side, it seems that for this blade size, the Lancet is just about the right thickness and that the Worker blade could very definitely thinner without losing too much in performance. One of the reasons that I carry the Lancet is that it is very light at 27 grams. The Worker feels about double that. Reducing the blade thickness would lighten the knife and make it more attractive as an office EDC.
So is the blade thickness decided by economy of using similar thickness for all the knives produced? Decided by prototype? Has Spyderco looked into blades that are only 2.0 mm thick? And, do you like the blades the thickness they are, or do they seem too thick.
By the way, I love the blade thickness on the Chinook because it is such a good match to the overall design.
"Chance favors the prepared mind" - Louis Pasteur