golok
11-01-2000, 12:00 AM
Recently I acquired the Sharp Maker 204.
Initially, I had my doubts about its oft-mentioned excellence. However, now three weeks later, I am a believer. It is good. It lives up to its reputation and it is an invention that is also a marvellous piece of
engineering.
I must congratulate its designer and inventor, Sal. I understand that the Spyderco head honcho also designed the Military.
I have seen it, touched it but have the unfortunate luck of not owning one, yet. However I like what I have touched and seen.
It is unlike the other Spydercos.
Knives are really a very personal thing. The maker of a particular knife may feel that his knife is the best but it is really up to the end-user.
Coming back to the Military, I am certainly impressed with its design and its character.
Again, I have to congratulate its designer.
One day, I hope to shake the hand of the man who designed this splendid piece of equipment. I am sure I will be impressed with the man too, as I already am with his knives, especially the Military.
Initially, I had my doubts about its oft-mentioned excellence. However, now three weeks later, I am a believer. It is good. It lives up to its reputation and it is an invention that is also a marvellous piece of
engineering.
I must congratulate its designer and inventor, Sal. I understand that the Spyderco head honcho also designed the Military.
I have seen it, touched it but have the unfortunate luck of not owning one, yet. However I like what I have touched and seen.
It is unlike the other Spydercos.
Knives are really a very personal thing. The maker of a particular knife may feel that his knife is the best but it is really up to the end-user.
Coming back to the Military, I am certainly impressed with its design and its character.
Again, I have to congratulate its designer.
One day, I hope to shake the hand of the man who designed this splendid piece of equipment. I am sure I will be impressed with the man too, as I already am with his knives, especially the Military.