travis quaas
06-06-2003, 12:00 AM
Mr. Janich,
I would call you to ask this question. But, I was thinking maybe getting everyone's opinion on this might spur some great conversation!
My question:
Would it be a "good" thing to have a somewhat dull tip on the the blade, for MBC applications?
The reason for my question is that I have always been taught to have a very sharp knife. "A sharp knife is a safe knife." to quote the Boy Scouts. But, I spoke with a Marine, and he was suggesting that having just a little bit of a dull knife would put the receiver of the cut in shock. He mentioned something about the cut "tearing" versus a "clean cut". The act of tearing would do the damage to put this person into shock. I would hate to mis-quote this gentleman. And I am sure I am doing a dis-service to what he was telling me. But, I'm sure you get the gist of what I'm trying to pass on. I wonder if the Military should be passing this bit of "knowledge" to their service-men and woman if it is not true. And if "tearing" is objective, why not just go with a SpyderEdge blade? I'm sure that when a person is wearing a Leather Jacket, you want a sharp knife to slice right through the material, outcome of a more penetrating cut. But, with a few controls here, assume that the receiver gets the cut on bare skin. And yes, assume that the "attacker" would still want to structurally stop the receiver.
Sorry for rambling. Your feedback is much appreciated (to everyone)!!
TQ
I would call you to ask this question. But, I was thinking maybe getting everyone's opinion on this might spur some great conversation!
My question:
Would it be a "good" thing to have a somewhat dull tip on the the blade, for MBC applications?
The reason for my question is that I have always been taught to have a very sharp knife. "A sharp knife is a safe knife." to quote the Boy Scouts. But, I spoke with a Marine, and he was suggesting that having just a little bit of a dull knife would put the receiver of the cut in shock. He mentioned something about the cut "tearing" versus a "clean cut". The act of tearing would do the damage to put this person into shock. I would hate to mis-quote this gentleman. And I am sure I am doing a dis-service to what he was telling me. But, I'm sure you get the gist of what I'm trying to pass on. I wonder if the Military should be passing this bit of "knowledge" to their service-men and woman if it is not true. And if "tearing" is objective, why not just go with a SpyderEdge blade? I'm sure that when a person is wearing a Leather Jacket, you want a sharp knife to slice right through the material, outcome of a more penetrating cut. But, with a few controls here, assume that the receiver gets the cut on bare skin. And yes, assume that the "attacker" would still want to structurally stop the receiver.
Sorry for rambling. Your feedback is much appreciated (to everyone)!!
TQ